Видео

1)Посмотрите экспансию. Достаточно системы с постояннымиускорением. Вы сначала разгоняетесь до цели, на половины пути разворачиваете корабль и тормозите с тем же ускорением. Таким образом вектор тяги всегда направлены в одну сторону, прям как в лифте. Бах, у вас искусственная гравитация. Если хотите, чтобы было как на земле, то нужно ускоряться 9.8 км,/ч но это пока не достижимо. Зато можно постепенно кскоряться с помощью ионых двигателей

That’s pretty creative

Found your channel through this, if you're interested in making a video on that, I'd be very interested in seeing more about the feasibility of short radius centrifuges.

Why not just create a small artificial black hole in the middle?

Tether?! HELLLLLLLLLLLLLLL no. That's a massive disaster waiting to happen. Tethers are horrible if anything whatsoever goes wrong ever.

3 years later and 2 of that 3 billion space x received from the government hasnt done much. Space x still can't get star ship to explode. It won't get to the moon on the last billion, either. Yet another of Musks lies and failures.

Hey man, loved the video. I wanted to say that while it think it’s super important to make education content entertaining, and thus to do that one would need to make shorter content like you did by cutting out material (smart move) I would definitely love to see a video where you don’t hold back. For the boys ya know. So keep doing what you’re doing. It’s awesome. But you maybe one video this year do something more for yourself. A video where you get to just let loose and talk about all the wills and wacky things you think about. Cause I know I wish I could do that. But I don’t have an audience like you. I would love to see it.

Wtf is he talking about we went to the moon and they did it with out a y of that junk we jad people on the ISS for years and they had no problems when they came back

Subbed

I’d rather go to Titan

The accelerate/decelerate the small radius machine inside the ship, you would have to counterbalance the ship by using thrusters.

They couldn't stop the swelling of the eyes with the short radius centrifuge. Well yeah, duh. You are rising around the head so the head gets no "gravity" so the blood isn't pulled out of the head by the "gravity".

[*orry, my * key no longer work* I have a PO* Dell laptop.] I'm really not into all the*e detail*. Ju*t *how u* an animation of two *tar*hip* tethered together and rotating no*e to no*e on the way to Mar*. End of video. And don't tell me you can't hook them together no*e to no*e. Innovate!!

Thank you I have a compulsion and need to try to understand the aspects of rotational Dynamics to create a stable artificial gravity that doesn't make you want to vomit or feel nauseous at all times it's very interesting and very much more complicated unless you're in a shit that's a Taurus I suppose although I find the concept of basically lobbing to tethered ships occasionally giving a boost to the ship that's on the Ford Mustang motion to tag the one behind so to speak yet rotating with it and Tethered to give boosts of velocity on occasion and I suppose it could be used to slow the velocity as well

Apparently Spacex tested tumbling starship in the last test flight. Rotating ship consumes fuel, no way to correct trajectory while spinning so it must be stopped and started again with thrusters

"That 2.98B will DEFINITELY speed up development" Whoops, nope, just went down the drain cuz Musk is a grifter

Heretics.

I think if you rewatch his video, he multiple times qualifies 'strongest shape' with provisions like 'least amount of material for strength' and such. He even fully explained graphene's weaknesses. That being said, both videos are quite informative.

I think that we ought to at least send a spaceship up to do some real tests in space. The testing we have done on Earth is fighting against the real gravity of our planet, producing I think some skewing of the gravity data. In any case, if we were to provide a spinning environment for astronauts, they could perhaps retire to their beds for a good night's sleep in artificial gravity. This might make long voyages more tolerable because at least they could lie down as they sleep, maybe feeling more refreshed to work out the day's activities.

Lets take a moment to appreciate the quick remote camera work at arecibo tht gave us some once in a lifetime footage!

If we are waiting for Space X it is irrelevant because we will not be going anywhere.

we shouldnt go to mars.

soo 333 cents each, lol

Why cant elon just accept that the starship isn't a wonder ship, and that it would be easier for everyone to have a seperate craft for interplanetary voyages?

Skateboarders know all about the intermediate axis. Spinning the board around the other two axis are some of the first tricks you learn, flipping the board around the intermediate axis is called "The Impossible."

Would the three ship tether model be more stable if a boom was extended in both directions along the long axis of the central ship, changing the motion from a flip to a spin?

6.33M subs vs 12K... Let's see who wins I think we already know who will win G R E Y

I dont understand why it's so hard. Just make a gravity generator smh.

"What if the teather breaks?" As if we can't build huge suspension bridges.

3 years on musk has missed every projected milestone, and starship can't even get into a lunar orbit, let alone to Mars. Waist of money giving that conman the contract.

Regarding using thrusters to spin up the tethered artificial gravity, if you use a rigid truss couldn't you instead do it with a reaction wheel? More generally, regarding the issues about stability can't many of these be handled with active control using reaction wheels?

It says ANSA on the chest.

If we are talking about what makes sense, a nuclear powered ship with a habitat ring.

Equivalence principal says that is real gravity

2:30 Stupid question: did you try your centrifuge experiments with the occupant in a fetal position?

Howdy from Temple, Texas on May 11th, 2024!

Is the thumb musk or not? Only reason I clicked.

Begun, the polygon wars have.

Radio frequency with a lot of power. You can do a lot with it.

That short clip you showed of the guy in the centrifuge testing and saying it didn't reduce pressure in the eyes, I'm a layman and can tell you his head was basically at the center of the centrifuge meaning his heads had no simulated gravity effects, and they thought they were doing science? 🤦🏼‍♂️

Why did the animation say ansa

This was fantastic. I'm glad you included the failures in history too and recognized their achievements even in failure. The N1 is one of spaceflights greatest what-ifs. I wish the world had seen a successful flight of that thing. That being said, the fact that they never got it right in four attempts really shows in contrast the greatness of the Saturn V. What's crazy is how different Artemis will be than the Apollo era. Looking back at Apollo, its the Saturn V that stands out as THE rocket. But, for Artemis, I imagine most people will not know what the SLS is, even after we land on the moon again. Instead, it'll be Starship and its booster that everyone will think of when they think of us going to the moon a second time. Even though it, as of now, will only land humans on the moon, not launch them there. Don't get me wrong, the SLS is great. I just think it just won't be the rocket that cements itself in the culture at large when it comes to the Artemis missions. And that's because of what this video shows: the biggest, most powerful rockets -- especially when successful, make the biggest impressions.

Centrifugal forces only work on a body with gravity such as the Earth. In space you would need EXPONENTIAL acceleration for it to work. otherwise you'd be spinning as fast as all around you but without any forces pulling you down on the floor. I am amazed this hasn't been pointed out more clearly so far.

hexagons made of triangles are the bestagons.

I lovethe idea of using a short radius centrifuge and being like, well we couldnt get the pressure in the eyes down. Like, no shit. The head is the center of rotation. Youve applied no force to the relevant area

"Sir, this is still a Wendy's."

The biggest issue with producing artificial gravity is the energy required to maintain a constant acceleration.

Just accelerate at 9.8 m/s the whole way.

Yes but gravity isn’t what holds down onto this planet it’s air pressure, without air pressure we would just fly off into space. The Earths gravity is rather weak in reality and it is only a very small part of the equation. Centrifugal force is not going to create gravity and it doesn’t attract it just pushes out.

I remember when I was a kid I thought they just had rooms where they could somehow cancel gravity and that’s how astronauts trained.